Inside this issueCover storiesA continuous infusion of philanthropyNew Cancer Center head: ‘aspire to cure cancers’Alpern reappointed to new term as dean of medical school
PeopleLifelines: Jorge GalánExpert on spinal cord injury receives VA's highest scientific awardDean of Public Health is Anna M.R. Lauder ProfessorBerliner Professor envisions blood vessel growth as therapyExpert on kidney development, repair is named Long ProfressorFive medical school faculty are elected to a venerable groupOut & aboutScienceA protein's surprise role in Alzheimer'sHow membranes get the bendsAdvances: Living dangerously, in more ways than one | A new syndrome, a new role for a geneHealthAdvances: Relax—for your heart's sake | Drug can curb both smoking and drinkingPartnershipsGrants & contractsSupporting medical educationDownload this issue in PDF format |
How membranes get the bendsYale team’s close-up look at membrane bending
|
|||||
Vinzenz Unger, Pietro De Camilli, and Adam Frost used electron microscopy to determine how proteins known as BAR domains help to bend membranes into the tubes, spheres and other curved structures that make normal cellular function possible. |
In a paper published in March 2008 in the journal Cell, a School of Medicine team led by Vinzenz M. Unger, Ph.D., associate professor of molecular biophysics and biochemistry, gave researchers a clear new view of this process and answered some of the unresolved questions in the field. That paper was recently selected by the journal Nature as one of the most significant scientific contributions of 2008.
Over the past several years, scientists around the world, including Pietro De Camilli, Ph.D., the Higgins Trust Professor of Cell Biology, have used molecular biology, electron microscopy (EM), and X-ray crystallography to determine that banana-shaped protein modules called BAR domains help membranes assume tubular or spherical shapes.
But the precise role played by BARs in the transformation of flat membranes to curved structures was unknown. Some scientists proposed a scaffolding model, in which attractive forces acting between membranes and the curved face of BAR domains create tubes and spheres in a passive manner. Other researchers, including De Camilli—whose lab first established the curvature-generating properties of proteins containing BAR domains—found that a type of BARs known as n-BARs include, or are flanked by, a molecular “wedge.” It was suggested that this wedge is inserted into the membrane, causing the membrane to buckle and bind to the BAR domains’ curvature.
Many banana-shaped BARs (gray) interact with one another to form a helical scaffold around membranes (green) to form tubes. |
While each of these processes may contribute to membrane bending to some extent, it has been difficult to appreciate the sequence of events that lead to membrane deformation, because no one had ever directly visualized BAR domains at work. “In structural biology, there is a complete black box at the interface between the membrane and water,” says Unger. “But it’s there that molecules come together, forming complexes of different compositions, and it’s those dynamic events that make a lot of biology happen.”
Unger and his colleagues are breaking open that black box with a
technique known as cryoelectron microscopy (cryoEM), which preserves
the biological integrity of membranes and their associated proteins. In
cryoEM, a biological structure of interest is preserved in a
near-native aqueous environment by plunging the sample into liquid
ethane, which cools the water at the rate of 100,000 degrees Celsius
per second and suspends the structure at minus 172 degrees Celsius in a
protective, utterly transparent ice-like solid.
To get a close-up view of how BARs might operate in cells, Adam
Frost, M.D., Ph.D., a student in Unger’s lab who began a postdoctoral
fellowship at the University of California–San Francisco in April,
created artificial membranes that closely mimic those found in cells
and then added protein domains in the BAR family known as f-BARs. “It
was a little less than a year of biochemistry to get a sample that
generated a great image,” Frost explains. “Then it was another two
years of taking images and analyzing them.”
In the paper lauded by Nature, on which Frost was first
author, one of the most surprising things those images revealed is that
BARs can bind to membranes while lying on their sides, like individual
bananas sitting on a kitchen counter. Previous experiments had not
identified any membrane-binding regions in this part of BAR proteins,
but the cryoEM images clearly showed sidewise binding.
The team also examined BARs on tubular membranes. (The smallest were
less than 600 angstroms across. By comparison, a sheet of paper is
about 1 million angstroms thick.) Images of these showed that abundant
BAR proteins had formed a dense outer coat on the tubes by binding on
their curved surfaces and by interacting with one another at sites on
their sides and at their tips; complementary experiments performed in
De Camilli’s lab showed that mutations in these lateral or tip-to-tip
binding sites disrupt tubule formation in cells.
Finally, the micrographs showed that the angle at which BARs sidle
up to one another when forming a tube’s coat helps to determine the
tube’s diameter.
Based on these combined results, the authors propose that, on flat
membranes, BARs accumulate on their sides, nesting within one another
until attractive forces at their lateral surfaces cause them to turn
onto their tips en masse, pulling the membrane into a rounded shape as
the binding regions on their curved surfaces come into play. The BARs
then interact with one another to provide a stabilizing coat and to
determine the diameter of tubular structures.
As the authors write in Cell, at least in the case of F-BARs, the work demonstrates that “tubule formation … results through a shape-based scaffolding system that is amplified by the self-assembly of a helical coat,” with no apparent contribution of molecular wedges.
Some of the most important cellular processes, including many
involved in human disease, take place at membranes, but Unger says that
the limitations of most imaging methods in this realm mean that cell
biology textbooks have so far had to rely on “cartoons”—artists’
renderings largely based on inference. As Nature’s top paper
designation indicates, however, scientists are increasingly turning to
cryoEM to get a truer picture of these interactions. “We’ll never stand
a chance of targeting any of these molecules for drug development,”
Unger says, “if we don’t use imaging to replace those cartoons with the
real thing.” ![]()
